ENGLISH
 日本語 中文 한국어
|
|
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
SITE MAP
|
 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Standards Acceleration Is Sign of Growing Market Adoption for Device ManagementBy Elad GranotDirector of Standards and Alliances Red Bend Software Standards play a critical role in emerging technologies in their path towards technical maturity and in their quest for widespread market adoption. Recently I have been reviewing the OMA Device Management enablers with a focus on how the older deliverables of the OMA-DM Working Group differ from the upcoming deliverables being worked today. When examining the evolution of OMA DM papers and working procedures over the past years, I have noticed several positive signs in the development of device management enablers which show the growing market adoption of over-the-air software update services. A number of signs bring me to this conclusion, and the rest of this post will point out these factors. As a background, let’s look briefly at the DM historical milestones: · April 2002 – SyncML Specifications V1.1 are approved by SyncML Initiative. · November 2002 – The SyncML Initiative is merged into OMA · May 2003 – SyncML specs converted to OMA format, creating SyncML Common 1.1.2, Data Synchronization 1.1.2 (DS) and Device Management 1.1.2 (DM) · December 2003 – SyncML-DM 1.1.2 is approved by OMA · November 2004 – SyncML-DM renamed to OMA-DM · Jun 2005 – OMA-DM 1.2 spec reaches Candidate state · July 2006 – OMA-DS 1.2 release is approved by OMA · February 2007 – OMA-DM 1.2 release is approved by OMA Sign #1 – Established Organizational Processes Speed Time to Market In the beginning, the work was relatively slow, mainly because the establishment of OMA organizational processes was happening in parallel with the standardization of DM and Firmware Update Management Object (FUMO). This fact, along with the work that was needed to adapt the outputs of the SyncML Initiative to the overall ‘look and feel’ of OMA outputs, created a challenge for the DM Working Group that resulted in some unavoidable compromise in terms of work quality and timely delivery of the standard. The good news is that these historical constraints no longer affect the current DM Enablers (also known as Management Objects, or MO’s) being worked today in the OMA-DM Working Group. OMA process issues that were not clear in the early days of the organization have been clarified and significantly improved since, allowing faster progress. For example, recently a new type of document template (named Data Specification) was created in OMA to be used for all OMA deliverables for which there are no behavior associated. Some MO’s are perfect candidates for using this template, which will facilitate easier and quicker release of these MO’s by relaxing some of the ‘classic’ time-consuming production steps used for other standard documents which are totally redundant in the context of these Management Objects. OMA is further working on shortening the time to market for new device management technologies and has recently created an ad-hoc group dedicated to investigating and proposing further improvements. Sign #2 – The Success of FUMO 1.0 FUMO 1.0 was the first separate standard MO on top of the DM protocol. It became candidate in mid 2006 and released as an approved enabler, after a successful period of interoperability testing in February 2007. FUMO, which has been proven by extremely high success scores in interoperability fests, is the first DM application that expands OMA-DM beyond simple parameter configuration. This DM enabler is being deployed by leading vendors in the mobile industry, and provides a concrete and live environment from which the DM community can learn which design principles are working best and which concepts can be improved. Sign #3 – More Vendors Participating Leads to More Robust Technology that is More Widely Adopted Players from across the mobile value chain (and recently not only mobile, with the proliferation of OMA into the fixed environment) constantly show high interest and involvement in the DM Working Group, which implies high commitment and strong belief in that work. It also means greater motivation for companies to propose and push their initiatives, which is a vital factor in a contribution-based organization such as OMA. With the formal release of DM 1.2 (and FUMO 1.0) this level of interest is expected to sustain, if not grow. In fact, some ideas have been raised about taking DM beyond the mobile environment, in order to address some of the challenges emerging in the fixed telecom environment. Sign #4 – Expanding Use of the Technology Leads to New Requirements With this increased momentum, it should come as no surprise that there are multiple DM enablers showing nice progress: DiagMon, Scheduling, ConnMO, and DCMO. For example, the Software Component Management Object (SCOMO) Requirements reached Candidate and the Architecture is now being reviewed, while the technical specification also showed significant progress. On top of that, the recent creation of new enablers (such as Lock and Wipe MO) validates the momentum of DM being an acceptable framework for management in the mobile industry. Sign #5 – Care for High Quality, Consistency and Clarity In addition to this progress, the quality of the deliverables also improves as the DM Work Group improves the consistency across architectures of these various enablers. This consistency facilitates greater re-use of concepts, which results in better clarity, improved quality and shorter time for developing the specifications. But as an extra consequential bonus, it also suggests a greater potential for vendors to reuse some common components across their different MO implementations. Furthermore, many contributions proposed for the standard show great care for clarity and simplicity of the specification text, resulting in higher quality and ease of implementation. Summary In summary, the future of DM standardization appears to be positive. It builds on the strong foundation of standards created since 2002. With recent improvements to the process and organization around OMA, I believe the momentum surrounding DM and the various Management Objects will continue. Since OMA is a market-driven (and moreover, a contribution-driven) organization, the acceleration of the standards process is a strong indication that the business of DM is also taking off. Labels: device management, DM, FOTA, OMA, standards
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Copyright ® 2010 Red Bend All Rights Reserved.
Home | Solutions | Customers | Partners | Company | Terms | Contact Us | Site Map |